STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: f21 top...cute or no?


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2053
Date:
f21 top...cute or no?
Permalink Closed


Product Picture It is a built in top and shirt for $19.80

__________________

Some people collect stamps and coins--I collect shoes.

Visit me at http://shoesandsewing.blogspot.com



BCBG

Status: Offline
Posts: 172
Date:
Permalink Closed

i m not crazy abt it, sorry.

__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 6191
Date:
Permalink Closed

I saw them IRL and, no offense or anyting, I can't allow anyone who is remotely fashionable to own one. They just remind me way too much of the time period when they were last fashionable (?) in 1997/1998.


I think I saw them for sale at esteemed places such as Bradlees and National Wholesale Liquidators.


I would like the look if it was two separate pieces, though.


 



__________________


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1210
Date:
Permalink Closed

Lilykind wrote:



I saw them IRL and, no offense or anyting, I can't allow anyone who is remotely fashionable to own one. They just remind me way too much of the time period when they were last fashionable (?) in 1997/1998.


I think I saw them for sale at esteemed places such as Bradlees and National Wholesale Liquidators.


I would like the look if it was two separate pieces, though.


 





 


 


That's funny-I feel the same way.  I don't mind the look but I have an aversion to the "built in" design too!



__________________
www.moneysavinggirl.blogspot.com


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 4919
Date:
Permalink Closed

I agree with Lilykind. If it were two separate pieces, it would be cute. The built-in thing? Not so cute.

__________________


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1220
Date:
Permalink Closed

The built-in thing doesn't bother me because you'll never have to tug your clothes so they sit properly. Other than that, those type of shirts come in and out every other year. If it fits into your style, yay, but I, myself wouldn't buy it.

Semi-cute, but nay.

__________________



Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1210
Date:
Permalink Closed

It's just not working - I have a feeling the built-in thing on a F21 top would be just too obvious, given the quality (i.e. not look like 2 pieces), and the vest-y part looks a bit casual to be over the sharper white shirt.

__________________

tk



BCBG

Status: Offline
Posts: 107
Date:
Permalink Closed

it seems wrong to deny yourself the opportunity to buy a shirt and layer it with different things every week, but with this shirt, you really have no way to change it up

__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 5919
Date:
Permalink Closed

Lilykind wrote:

I saw them IRL and, no offense or anyting, I can't allow anyone who is remotely fashionable to own one. They just remind me way too much of the time period when they were last fashionable (?) in 1997/1998.


I think I saw them for sale at esteemed places such as Bradlees and National Wholesale Liquidators.


I would like the look if it was two separate pieces, though.


 





I'm the same way! I hate "cheating" clothes - I don't want things to appear as one thing and actually be another. I know there are more examples than the button up under the sweater, but I can't think of any, now. I know that they can look better because there isn't weird bunching, and sometimes I absolutely LOVE a sweater with a built in shirt underneath and would totally put it on top of a similar shirt if it was alone... but I cannot bring myself to buy clothing that misrepresents itself.

__________________

Fashion is art you live your life in. - Devil Wears Prada | formerly ttara123

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard