STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: January Lucky


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 4919
Date:
January Lucky
Permalink Closed


Was anyone else bored?

First- The colors on the cover design- brown, tan, gold, purple, soft pink. Not anything new. I've been obsessed with that color combination for quite a while now.

Second- Round-toe wedges. Nothing new here, either

Third- Basics- pencil skirt, turtleneck layered with tank. Again, nothing new. Show me something that I haven't thought of already.

Fourth- Mixing Bright Colors. Blah, blah, blah. Been there, done that. Everytime I turned the page I saw a combo that I've been wearing for a while.

Meh. I was dissapointed in this issue.

__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 5131
Date:
Permalink Closed

yep. not to metion 95% of the items shown were pretty fug. There were a few things that I liked, but they were all super $$$.

__________________
"Life's too short to wear ugly shoes."

My recipe blog: healthy-delicious.com


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2030
Date:
Permalink Closed

I find that lucky seems to be loosing its edge a bit.

Now here is an idea - Anthro should come out with a fashion mag. Wouldnt we all love that advice!!

__________________
xoxo gossip girl!


Kenneth Cole

Status: Offline
Posts: 462
Date:
Permalink Closed

I felt the same, Kenzie!  And it never helps that the January issue is like the thinnest of the year... I always finish and think, "I'm done already!?"

Katherine Heigl does look nice on the cover, but I'm getting tired of seeing the same cover combinations every month.  It's always a cami/tank dress with a cardigan or jacket over it.  Always!

Things I didn't like: the knit layering article (the ideas were just not wearable!), featuring shearling in the What I Want Now! section (they feature shearling ALL. The. Time.  it's cute, but show us something new!)


Things I did like: the Avril Gau bag in the What's Next section


They seem to have done away with my favorite feature -- a week's worth of style.  I always loved that, but I haven't seen it in months.

Whew... that was cathartic :)  Guess I needed to vent about Lucky!



__________________


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Permalink Closed

The thing that disturbed me was when they said the next IT bag would be a leather backback. I just couldn't go back there...

__________________


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1520
Date:
Permalink Closed

I just didn't feel it.  Although I loved the Christian Louboutin kelly green wedges...those were awesome.  And I really miss the week's worth of clothing feature.  It was so helpful to see someone make a few pieces work so hard.  I hope they bring it back!

__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 5131
Date:
Permalink Closed

boobaby wrote:

The thing that disturbed me was when they said the next IT bag would be a leather backback. I just couldn't go back there...



I let out an audible groan when I saw that. Please no!!

__________________
"Life's too short to wear ugly shoes."

My recipe blog: healthy-delicious.com


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:
Permalink Closed

jacks435 wrote:


They seem to have done away with my favorite feature -- a week's worth of style.  I always loved that, but I haven't seen it in months.



That was always my favorite too.  I have even ripped out a lot of those and pinned them up in my closet bulletin board for ideas.  They never did it very consistently, but it's been months since they've done one of those spreads. 


Also, yeah this issue was boring.  They had a pair of round toe patent Seychelles wedges that I know a bunch of people here have and bought months ago.  Either we're way ahead of the trends or Lucky has really lost its edge.



__________________

ihavetohaveit.blogspot.com



Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink Closed

oh thank god I'm not the only one who thought this was a terrible issue.  About the only things I liked was the bright blue color they featured in the bright color section (not that I could afford that stuff) and the green wedges kittenheels mentioned. 


I thought the white and black floral section was horrid.  I like white and black to wear but floral??  And how could they not feature one item from White and Black??  You can't tell me that there wasn't anything in that store that wouldn't work for their feature.


If I want overly expensive fashion I'll read In Style or Vogue - not Lucky



__________________
My blog -> http://www.theblondediaries.com/

http://twitter.com/blondediaries


Gucci

Status: Offline
Posts: 2881
Date:
Permalink Closed

I felt like I flipped through it in about five minutes. And I put it down thinking that maybe I shouldn't renew my sub. next time...some of the fall issues were okay, but I really miss the old Lucky - edgier, without nearly every item being signifcantly out of my price range.

I didn't even mark anything in the shoe section. And the whole Next Big Thing section - bleh.

I also miss the "week of style" feature. That was always fun and inspiring.

I wish there was something to replace it. :(

__________________

"Good taste shouldn't have to cost anything extra." - Mickey Drexler



Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 4387
Date:
Permalink Closed

I agree on the leather backpack. I'm afriad they're going to tell us the next it bag is the fanny pack.

__________________
I'm thinking balls are to men what purses are to women. It's just a little bag, but we feel naked in public without it. Carrie Bradshaw


Nine West

Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Date:
Permalink Closed

are all the fashion editors at lucky pregnant? if i see one more retro boxy dress or potato-sack shaped tunic i'm gonna go buy something made with spandex just to rebel!

and what the hell is with that girl on page 79 with the braid wrapped around her head??? "its so chic" ha. text cannot convey my utter repulsion.

__________________
A handbag may serve as a reflection of its owner's personality; it may fairly be said that in many cases a handbag is so essential that its owner would be lost without it. LOUIS VUITTON v. DOONEY & BOURKE, 454 F.3d 108 (2nd Cir. 2006)


Gucci

Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
Date:
Permalink Closed

Well I would like to comment on the issue, but I haven't gotten mine yet. Maybe next week.


jacks435 wrote:

They seem to have done away with my favorite feature -- a week's worth of style.  I always loved that, but I haven't seen it in months.


That is one of my favorite parts too! Maybe they'll bring it back again.

__________________
Veni, Vedi, Visa. I came, I saw, I did a little shopping.


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink Closed

Did anyone feel like that work style piece they did was basically the devil wears prada with that girl?  That revamped pic of her looked like something right out of that movie and that hair cut was definetly the same one.  I thought her hair was much prettier the old way.


Oh and no leather backpacks for me either.



__________________
My blog -> http://www.theblondediaries.com/

http://twitter.com/blondediaries


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 5131
Date:
Permalink Closed

Aurora wrote:

Did anyone feel like that work style piece they did was basically the devil wears prada with that girl?  That revamped pic of her looked like something right out of that movie and that hair cut was definetly the same one.  I thought her hair was much prettier the old way.


Oh and no leather backpacks for me either.





yep. And I felt bad for her!!

Didn't she look kind of like D in the aftre pic though? I had to do a double take!

__________________
"Life's too short to wear ugly shoes."

My recipe blog: healthy-delicious.com


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1252
Date:
Permalink Closed

What a tiny little issue. And I agree, everything is too expensive in the magazine.

__________________


Dooney & Bourke

Status: Offline
Posts: 612
Date:
Permalink Closed

How was the Beauty Section? (haven't gotten mine yet)



__________________

beautyloft.blogspot.com
trophywifeintrainingblog.blogspot.com



Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink Closed

fairywings wrote:



How was the Beauty Section? (haven't gotten mine yet)




I don't even remember seeing it in there if that helps you any... If it was there it wasn't very memorable as I have flipped through mine twice since getting it on friday.

__________________
My blog -> http://www.theblondediaries.com/

http://twitter.com/blondediaries


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1899
Date:
Permalink Closed

Aurora wrote:



Did anyone feel like that work style piece they did was basically the devil wears prada with that girl?  That revamped pic of her looked like something right out of that movie and that hair cut was definetly the same one.  I thought her hair was much prettier the old way.


Oh and no leather backpacks for me either.





omg I was thinking the exact same thing! Her hair was exactly the same with the bangs and everything.  I liked her "before" hair better. 


This issue was tiny compared to the previous issues.  The "Next Big Thing" issue was kinda boring too.



__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 5161
Date:
Permalink Closed

I have yet to pick up the Jan. issue of Lucky, after reading this, not sure if I want to.

__________________
"Until you spread your wings, you'll have no idea how far you can fly".
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard