For those of you that have read this book, I have a question for you. I just started reading this and I know there was a bunch of controversy surrounding the truth in this book. Is the whole story false, or just parts of it? Which parts are untrue?
I read it too. Even to say parts are EXAGERATED, is being nice. From what I hear too, most of it is untrue. The book was okay, but I felt that way more in amazment that someone could overcome all of those things. Then to learn in was mostly false...
i loved it. i read it before it came out that parts were exaggerated/made up and it didn't change my opinion at all. he may have exaggerated things a bit but that it probably close to how he perceived them at the time. when things are that bad, it seems normal that everything might appear even worse than reality. only hindsight would indicate the "truth." i also love that it shows that you can overcome an addiction without aa or 12 steps. it may be harder, and not everyone can do it, but i do like that its a story of someone who found the strength in himself.
I didn't really like the book, and I didn't find it especially well-written, either. The depiction of addiction was good, but not anything that hasn't been done before IMO.
__________________
"We live in an age where unnecessary things are our only necessities." --Oscar Wilde