STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 10/10 - Article of the Day: Drink, Don't Drink. Drink, Don't Drink.


Dooney & Bourke

Status: Offline
Posts: 818
Date:
10/10 - Article of the Day: Drink, Don't Drink. Drink, Don't Drink.
Permalink Closed


October 9, 2005 Drink, Don't Drink. Drink, Don't Drink. By CLIFFORD J. LEVY

IN April, Kansas tightened its drunken-driving law. It was nothing surprising: since the days when Carry Nation took a hatchet to its speakeasies, the state has tended to have a low drinking rate and an even lower tolerance for the recklessly inebriated.


Yet just a month later, the state relaxed its ban on the Sunday sale of liquor. In some parts, it is now as easy to buy a bottle of gin after church as a stick of butter.


If Kansas seems at cross-purposes, then consider the zigs and zags of the television industry. In recent years, liquor commercials have sprouted in vast numbers on cable stations and affiliates of the major broadcast networks. But the networks themselves continue to bar them, even as they run beer commercials with bikini-clad women. Liquor commercials, the networks worry, might offend people's sensibilities.


Unlike, say, the French or Italians, Americans have often regarded drinking with a kind of unease that gives rise to contradictions and dissonance and boomerang shifts in attitudes. Lately, as the alcohol industry pushes to increase sales by trying to remove some of the regulations and stigma surrounding it, and advocacy groups and health experts push back, these strains seem all the more evident.


States are tightening some alcohol laws and loosening others, including repealing bans on Sunday sales and liquor billboards, and permitting stores to hold free tasting events for hard liquor. Businesses are embracing alcohol and the dollars it brings, while trying to convey that they do so only halfheartedly.


Wal-Mart is plunging into liquor retailing, even as it maintains a longstanding ban on alcohol at its headquarters and at all corporate events. Nascar is allowing Jim Beam and other liquor brands to festoon its cars with the emblems of sponsorship, but promises that their messages will be "strongly grounded in responsibility." So television networks that bar liquor commercials are broadcasting races where liquor advertising is prominent.


"There are these really ambiguous messages about alcohol that you end up receiving from the leadership of the country," said Paul M. Roman, a sociologist at the University of Georgia. "The messages end up being very mixed up and very confusing. And this ambivalence has been around a long time."


In fact, it dates to before independence. Policies regarding alcohol have been shaped by sometimes clashing beliefs. Personal freedom is valued, but a puritanical streak lingers. There is trust in free markets but also a wariness of treating alcohol as just any product.


Consumption levels have oscillated wildly in American history. They have dropped in recent years, in part because of warnings about drunken driving and the health effects of heavy drinking. Consumption of hard alcohol sagged by roughly 40 percent between 1980 and 2002, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (Consumption of beer was down 10 percent; consumption of wine was stable.)


This collapse in sales has led the alcohol industry, especially distillers, to challenge the boundaries of television advertising and state liquor laws. A voluntary agreement to keep liquor commercials off television fell apart in the mid-1990's. But the ads have proliferated only in the last few years. The number of liquor commercials on national cable networks jumped to more than 37,000 in 2004 from 645 in 2001, according to the Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth at Georgetown University.


The major broadcast networks will not show the ads - though cable stations that have the same owners do.


Under the current voluntary practices, for example, the Fox Sports cable network will run liquor commercials after 10 p.m., but its corporate cousin, the Fox broadcast network, will not run them when it shows its own nighttime sports programming.


The distinctions can have little to do with the shows that the commercials will interrupt. Jack Daniels can advertise on the serious-minded "NewsNight With Aaron Brown" on CNN, which began accepting liquor ads this year, but not on the commercial time on "Desperate Housewives" sold by the ABC network. .


The major broadcast networks say they are far more regulated than cable stations, so they are leery of offending federal officials, and they reach households across the nation, including areas that frown on drinking. Of course, the cable stations are almost as widely available, though not as widely viewed. What it comes down to is a perception that liquor commercials on the major networks would symbolize that liquor is nearly as unexceptional as Diet Coke, and the nation may not be ready for that.


A few years ago, NBC tried to become the first broadcast network to run liquor commercials, but retreated under fire from some officials and advocacy groups. "There is so much sensitivity toward alcohol and how it is consumed," explained Alan Wurtzel, president of research at NBC Universal.


But what about beer commercials?


The fissures are also revealed in the debates over bans on Sunday sales of liquor. Twelve states, including Kansas and New York, have now scaled back these laws in some form in recent years, leaving 16 states that still have strict bans on Sunday sales of liquor, according to the Distilled Spirits Council.


Distillers and merchants have lobbied for the repeals, and lawmakers often agree in hopes that they will reap more taxes from increased sales. Still, the states wind up with their own tangle of messages. On the one hand, officials urge people to drink only in moderation, if at all, and to give the car keys to someone else if they are intoxicated. On the other hand, officials are making alcohol more accessible and visible - and studies suggest that easier access to alcohol may lead to more social problems, like alcoholism, violence and drunken driving. That is why states raised the drinking age to 21 in the first place.


In Kansas, some lawmakers expressed these concerns, but a majority in the Legislature sided with distillers and liquor stores in border areas who complained that they were losing business to other states on Sundays.


"This was an economic issue," said Tom Groneman, director of Alcohol Beverage Control in Kansas. "It keeps the dollars in Kansas."


While the law now offers localities the option of approving or rejecting Sunday sales, it makes one Sunday sacrosanct. No matter what the localities decide, no liquor store in Kansas can open on Easter.



-- Edited by Irene at 12:12, 2005-10-11

__________________


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1652
Date:
RE: Article of the Day: Drink, Don't Drink. Drink, Don't Drink.
Permalink Closed


this sounds almost too simple to mention, but it's just about the money.


I won't get into my personal opinions of the alcohol industry, but I will say that I believe that alcohol use and abuse has done more harm than good in this country and others.  I am no puritan either, fyi, just a witness to it's harm and observer of the lower class in this country....who generally aren't featured in the ads, but who probably consume the most.  I do agree with the side that says advertising should be limited.  Unfortunately, I am also for free speech, so I have to take that side.  My hope is that advertisers will take more responsibility and either tone down their ads and keep them off regular tv times and stations.  idealistic, I know.



__________________
"Go either very cheap or very expensive. It's the middle ground that is fashion nowhere." ~ Karl Lagerfeld
dc


Dooney & Bourke

Status: Offline
Posts: 923
Date:
Permalink Closed

Eh, it really comes down to personal responsibility to me. I don't think advertising or when or where booze is sold really affects a person's choices or that it encourages or discourages use either way. I don't notice the ads at all. And trust me, a person who has an alcohol problem will get their hands on booze no matter what day of the week it is. Before worrying about advertising and where booze is sold, we need to look at the reasons WHY people drink to an unhealthy extent, such as depression, poverty (as lorelei touched on), etc. Once you make inroads into mental health and poverty issues, you'll make a dent in the drinking problem (and crime, for that matter).

And I don't get the Sunday/religious holiday thing at all - it's a clear church/state/promotion of religion issue.

And like the way we treat s-e-x in our culture, I think the more taboo you make something, the more allure it has to certain demographics. Other countries do not have the sort of trouble we have with underage drinking, for example. (And teenagers will get their hand on booze one way or another - I had zero trouble myself marching into bars and liquor stores starting at age 15.) But other cultures don't glamorize booze and drinking like we do - it's just another facet of a meal or socializing.

It's funny, the last couple of times I have been in Italy and France, I have been really aware of how much I consume, and the enjoyment and savoring of a beverage. Being drunk in public is really frowned upon in other countries (whereas here it's celebrated in frat houses and girls gone wild - woo-hoo!), yet they don't have this sort of all-or-nothing approach to drinking we do. It's about moderate enjoyment. I am not saying people don't tie one on every now and then, and every country has its drunks, but it's just a more natural approach in general. And there is ZERO tolerance for drinking and driving in most european countries. Here, I'd be hard pressed to name anyone I know who doesn't or hasn't driven drunk occasionally or who doesn't have a DUI. For that reason I am all for tough drinking and driving rules. People don't think they'll get caught, or don't think the punishment is so bad, so everyone risks it and it is somewhat socially ok - that's got to change.

__________________
~ dc "Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination" - Oscar Wilde


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1913
Date:
Permalink Closed


dc wrote:

And like the way we treat s-e-x in our culture, I think the more taboo you make something, the more allure it has to certain demographics. Other countries do not have the sort of trouble we have with underage drinking, for example. (And teenagers will get their hand on booze one way or another - I had zero trouble myself marching into bars and liquor stores starting at age 15.) But other cultures don't glamorize booze and drinking like we do - it's just another facet of a meal or socializing.



I completely agree with everything dc said, especially this part. 21 is a RIDICULOUSLY high drinking age. If anything I would say it results in more drinking among young people rather than less drinking. I just absolutely do not understand why someone would need to be 21 years old to drink, but only 16 to drive. Driving is much more dangerous, IMO.

__________________


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 4845
Date:
Permalink Closed

I don't really want to comment on drinking or drinking and driving or any of that because I don't have an opinion I'm satisfied with on the subjects. However, I do believe it's absolutely RIDICULOUS to have the no alcohol on Sunday rules. Who cares? In Texas, you can't buy anything but wine and beer on Sundays and only after noon. Why? It makes no sense to me.


I remember one year it was New Year's Eve on Sunday and we went out to buy some vodka or something for a party that night and we couldn't buy it in a store. But I can go in a bar and buy a vodka drink. There's no rhyme or reason to that stupid rule and I'd be happy to see it go.



__________________
http://dailypointers.blogspot.com/
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard