STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Bush nominates White House counsel Miers for Supreme Court
cc


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2047
Date:
Bush nominates White House counsel Miers for Supreme Court
Permalink Closed


washingtonpost.com
Bush Taps Harriet Miers for High Court

By DEB RIECHMANN
The Associated Press
Monday, October 3, 2005; 9:11 AM

WASHINGTON -- President Bush on Monday nominated White House counsel Harriet Miers to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court, reaching into his loyal inner circle for another pick that could reshape the nation's judiciary for years to come.

"She has devoted her life to the rule of law and the cause of justice," Bush said as his first Supreme Court pick, Chief Justice John Roberts, took the bench for the first time just a few blocks from the White House. "She will be an outstanding addition to the Supreme Court of the United States."

If confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate, Miers, 60, would join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the second woman on the nation's highest court and the third to serve there. Miers, who has never been a judge, was the first woman to serve as president of the Texas State Bar and the Dallas Bar Association.

Miers, whom Bush called a trailblazer for women in the legal profession, said she was humbled by the nod.

"If confirmed, I recognize I will have a tremendous responsibility to keep our judicial system strong and to help insure the court meets their obligations to strictly apply the laws and Constitution," she said.

Democratic and Republican special interests groups had been braced for a political brawl over the pick, but they may not get it. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had urged the president to consider Miers, according to several officials familiar with Bush's consultations with Congress.

Miers has no judicial record, which may complicate any Democratic attempts to block her nomination. It is impossible to predict whether Miers and Roberts will shift the court to the right. She would replace O'Connor, a critical swing vote on the court who helped uphold the right to abortion and affirmative action. Rehnquist, the late chief justice being replaced by Roberts, was a consistent conservative vote.

"We know even less about Harriet Miers than we did about John Roberts and because this is the critical swing seat on the court, Americans will need to know a lot more about Mier's judicial philosophy and legal background before any vote for confirmation," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., a member of the Judiciary Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said: "With this selection, the president has chosen another outstanding nominee to sit on our nations highest court. Ms. Miers is honest and hard working and understands the importance of judicial restraint and the limited role of a judge to interpret the law and not legislate from the bench."

Bush, his approval rating falling in recent months, had been under intense pressure to nominate a woman or a minority.

Miers had helped push Roberts' nomination through the Senate, and Bush said that "she will strictly interpret our Constitution and laws. She will not legislate from the bench." Conservatives apparently agreed.

Initial reaction from conservatives was positive.

"She has been a forceful advocate of conservative legal principles and judicial restraint throughout her career," said Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society.

"Harriet Miers is a top-notch lawyer who understands the limited role that judges play in our society," said Noel Francisco, former assistant White House counsel and deputy assistant attorney general during the Bush administration.

The president offered the job to Miers Sunday night over dinner in the residence. He met with Miers on four occasions during the past couple weeks, officials said.

Rehnquist, whose death paved way for Roberts' nomination, had not served as a judge before President Nixon put him on the Supreme Court. Nineteen other justices previously had never served as judges before getting on the high court.

According to the White House, 10 of the 34 Justices appointed since 1933, including Rehnquist and the late Justice Byron White, were appointed from positions within the president's administration.

"Having never served as a judge, Ms. Miers has no `paper trail' of judicial opinions, and prospective opponents thus will have a hard time identifying positions to protest or complain about," said Supreme Court historian David Garrow. "What's more, Ms. Miers' professional record as an attorney in Texas is undeniably one of significant achievement and accomplishment, and her proponents will be able to present her as a female trail blazer whose life-record is at least arguably comparable to that of Justice O'Connor."

Known for thoroughness and her low-profile, Miers is one of the first staff members to arrive at the White House in the morning and among the last to leave.

When Bush named her White House counsel in November 2004, the president described Miers as a lawyer with keen judgment and discerning intellect _ "a trusted adviser on whom I have long relied for straightforward advice."

He also joked of Miers, "When it comes to a cross-examination, she can fillet better than Mrs. Paul."

With no record, liberals say the White House should be prepared for Miers to be peppered with questions during her Senate confirmation.

"Choosing somebody who is not a judge would put that much more of a premium on straight answers to questions because there would be that much less for senators and the public to go on when looking at such a nominee's judicial philosophy," says Elliot Mincberg, counsel with the liberal People for the American Way.

Formerly Bush's personal lawyer in Texas, Miers came with the president to the White House as his staff secretary, the person in charge of all the paperwork that crosses the Oval Office desk. Miers was promoted to deputy chief of staff in June 2003.

As an attorney in Dallas, Miers became president in 1996 of Locke Purnell, Rain & Harrell a firm with more than 200 lawyers where she worked starting in 1972. After it merged a few years later, she became co-manager of Locke Liddell & Sapp.

When Bush was governor of Texas, she represented him in a case involving a fishing house. In 1995, he appointed her to a six-year term on the Texas Lottery Commission. She also served as a member-at-large on the Dallas City Council and in 1992 became the first woman president of the Texas State Bar.

-- Edited by cc at 09:41, 2005-10-03

__________________
idprefernotto.blogspot.com


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 3274
Date:
Permalink Closed


cc wrote:

washingtonpost.com
Formerly Bush's personal lawyer in Texas, Miers came with the president to the White House as his staff secretary, the person in charge of all the paperwork that crosses the Oval Office desk. Miers was promoted to deputy chief of staff in June 2003.




oh man.

__________________
ayo


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1634
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'm not sure how I feel about this yet.


I actually had no problem with John Roberts, I border on actually liking him. In this case, I don't know enough about her to have an opinion. The only thing I question right now is her qualifications.



__________________
Proud momma of two princesses
dc


Dooney & Bourke

Status: Offline
Posts: 923
Date:
Permalink Closed

I am interested to know why (minority leader) Harry Reid (D-NV) would encourage this candidate, as that article says. 


Certainly other members of the court - including Chief Justices Rehnquist and Warren - have had no judicial experience, but she is too close to W for comfort to me. She's been in his inner circle for years. At least Roberts had some credentials and had argued 39 cases before the court.  Yeah, she was head of the Texas state bar, but that just means she's just a slightly above-average attorney who happens to know W.  She's never even argued a case before the supreme court. 


It should also be mentioned that she donated to Bush's 2004 Presidential campaign and also to his "re-count fund" in 2000, a year in which the supreme court decided our President.  So I guess we know how she would have decided that case.   


Ok, now to be childish... This is a rather unattractive picture.  She's a crony and a crone! Yeccch.  Someone should take her aside to discuss that black eyeliner. 



 



-- Edited by dc at 11:56, 2005-10-03

__________________
~ dc "Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination" - Oscar Wilde


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1796
Date:
Permalink Closed


dc wrote:


Ok, now to be childish... This is a rather unattractive picture.  She's a crony and a crone! Yeccch.  Someone should take her aside to discuss that black eyeliner. 

 




The eyeliner is horrible. I watched Bush nominate her, live this morning on the news. He spoke for what seemed like hours about her qualifications, and she stared at him, smiling, the whole time. It really creeped me out!

__________________


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 4845
Date:
Permalink Closed

The Dems are supporting her because she's waaaaaayyyyy better than any alternative. She's extremely moderate and has even supported some Democratic candidates in the past. The worst thing you can say about her (and possibly the only politically daming thing) is that she supports Bush. Obviously that's a flaw in character but does it mean she'll overturn Roe v. Wade? Not likely and that is a score for Dems.


Also by nominating someone so incredibly moderate, it's like Bush is saying he can't even try to win a fillibuster fight. He's not trying to fight or anything. It's definitely a sign of weakness. His conservative base is really pissed about this nomination. If a Repub is not happy about the nomination, you can bet your bottom dollar I'm thrilled for it.


And frankly, I don't really care if she's been a judge. I care more about what law she knows and what kind of thinker she is. If she can think critically and logically, I don't see what difference it really makes what kind of judicial experience she has. (Of course I wouldn't say that for civil or criminal judges because of the sheer number of cases and procedures that come before them but for the Supremes, they move at such a slower pace that I think it's okay.)


Anyway, I'm happy about Miers. I can't believe that after two nominees to the SCROTUS, the Court is only slightly more conservative than it was before. Frankly I was expecting much, much worse.



__________________
http://dailypointers.blogspot.com/


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1064
Date:
Permalink Closed

erin wrote:


cc wrote: washingtonpost.com Formerly Bush's personal lawyer in Texas, Miers came with the president to the White House as his staff secretary, the person in charge of all the paperwork that crosses the Oval Office desk. Miers was promoted to deputy chief of staff in June 2003. oh man.


 


DITTO



__________________
ayo


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1634
Date:
Permalink Closed

I was listening to something this morning and the belief is that she could possibly be anti-abortion. She never really shared her stance on it either way when asked about it in the past(which in her position as former head of the BAR association is probably best).


One of the things on Bush's agenda from the beginning of his presidency is overturning Roe v. Wade. It would make sense for him to appoint two people (given the chance) that would sway in that direction.


Of course I suspect we won't be able to hear most of her opinions on anything during the Senate hearings. She has a little thing called "privilege" working in her favor. So we may never really know where she stands on key issues.


My main concern about her were qualifications. I did a little more research and I'm fairly satisfied.


We shall see...


 



__________________
Proud momma of two princesses


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 6400
Date:
Permalink Closed

janey831 wrote:


erin wrote: cc wrote: washingtonpost.com Formerly Bush's personal lawyer in Texas, Miers came with the president to the White House as his staff secretary, the person in charge of all the paperwork that crosses the Oval Office desk. Miers was promoted to deputy chief of staff in June 2003. oh man.   DITTO


Tritto. No matter how good she is, she can't be the best out there. This editorial summed up my thoughts pretty well: http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20051004/cm_huffpost/008301;_ylt=Aur7yVHUKmkYjmi6uLSF3vv9wxIF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl


 



__________________
"We live in an age where unnecessary things are our only necessities." --Oscar Wilde


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1064
Date:
Permalink Closed

hmmm that was a very interesting article.  i agree with a lot it and some excellent points were made.

__________________


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1652
Date:
Permalink Closed

Maybe this is evidence that Bush isn't as much of a hardline right winger as most of his supporters and this is indicative of the fact that he knows he doesn't have to do everything they want because he doesn't have to worry about reelection anymore.  This was suggested on Springer on the radio on Air America the other morning and it kind of made sense.

__________________
"Go either very cheap or very expensive. It's the middle ground that is fashion nowhere." ~ Karl Lagerfeld
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard