STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Interesting thing heard on the news tonight...


Dooney & Bourke

Status: Offline
Posts: 718
Date:
Interesting thing heard on the news tonight...
Permalink Closed


FEMA ordered that those people who were coming to the Superdome bring 3 days worth of food with them like a "camp out".  This is one of the reasons that the red cross did not supply food and drink to the superdome.


I must point out a couple of things.



  • Many of the people who had cars and means to leave such left- did not go to the superdome

  • So those who did not immediately evacuate went to the superdome

  • I am going to assume that the MAJORITY of those in the superdome were many of the poverty stricken in NO

  • These poverty stricken do not know how they are going to get their next meal- let alone bring 3 days worth

  • Say that they could bring 3-days worth, I think that I would be afraid of someone stealing from me. Crimials are opportunists, I am sure that many people who brought food probably fought to keep it at some point.

So its the fault of these poverty stricken people that they were not fed or were dehydrated? I am severly confused. 


Did FEMA think about the demographics of who might end up there?



__________________


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 3388
Date:
Permalink Closed

FEMA is a little, uh, disorganized from my experience.  There was an article in the paper about a month ago that said FEMA had paid for 100-300 (can't remember the exact number, but somewhere in that ballpark) people to be buried that had died of hurricane causes.  Later it turned out these people had not died of hurricane causes, but of other things.  Way to research it .

__________________
Bad taste is like a nice dash of paprika. We all could use more of it. It's no taste I'm against. -Diana Vreeland


Gucci

Status: Offline
Posts: 2902
Date:
Permalink Closed

A lot of the people who normally evacuate to the Superdome are elderly and some poor but the majority of the poor stay at their house to protect it from looters. 


The superdome was never meant to be a shelter for this hurricane.  It was opened sunday as a shelter of last resort not a hurricane shelter (they are two different things).  there were other shelters around no with supplies to help evacuees and those were designated hurricane shelters.  Just FYI for those not use to hurricanes and NO.



__________________


Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 1550
Date:
Permalink Closed

i saw the spokeswoman from the Red Cross on tv the other day.  it's my understanding that the Red Cross was not even present at the Superdome, precisely because they were told not to be (by the mayor and governor).  as lsubatgirl said, it was supposed to be a shelter of last resort, and they wanted people to get out of the city rather than be encouraged to stay in it by the presence of a more long-term shelter (which is what the Red Cross usually sets up).  the Red Cross set up their shelters in areas that were accessible and not flooded, directly outside the city.  i didn't know this before, but apparently that is their usual course of action. 

__________________


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 4845
Date:
Permalink Closed

lsubatgirl wrote:


A lot of the people who normally evacuate to the Superdome are elderly and some poor but the majority of the poor stay at their house to protect it from looters.  The superdome was never meant to be a shelter for this hurricane.  It was opened sunday as a shelter of last resort not a hurricane shelter (they are two different things).  there were other shelters around no with supplies to help evacuees and those were designated hurricane shelters.  Just FYI for those not use to hurricanes and NO.


Maybe it's true that the Superdome wasn't supposed to be a hurricane shelter for THIS storm but it was used as a hurricane shelter for Ivan. This is a link to an article in the Times-Picayune stating just that in September 2004. http://www.archpundit.com/archives/012866.html And this article from January 2005 further discusses the use of the Superdome as a shelter in a hurricane (including it being upgraded to be used as such). http://www.archpundit.com/archives/012865.html


Even if it wasn't a planned shelter (although I think an argument can be made that it was), I see no reason why the leaders in the city couldn't see to provide potential shelters - wherever they were - with at least the bare minimum of supplies.



__________________
http://dailypointers.blogspot.com/
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard