STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Is this insurance fraud?


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2478
Date:
Is this insurance fraud?
Permalink Closed


A couple of weeks ago, I was having nerve problems/back problems so I went to a local chiropractor.  He asked me a few questions, checked my reflexes, then did 4 adjustments.  I got the bill from my insurance but noticed that he billed my insurance $495, including a breakdown for the visit itself, chiropractic manipulation, and "therapuetic activities".  This is such BS - I was in and out of the office in 20 mins and it didnt help much at all, nor did I get any therapy other than the guy maybe looking awkwardly down my shirt. 

I am noticing most of my doctors fib on the billing, charging really exorbitant prices and overexaggerating services - another example:

I had a ring get stuck on my finger and rushed to a dr's office to have it cut off.  They charged my insurance something like $700, called it "foreign body removal" and then decided they were a specialist and I owed them money for an additional copay. 

Isn't this fraud??? Why is it that if I pay cash I pay $60 but if it goes through my insurance the bill is 700% more???  I am lucky to have insurance that covers these bogus charges but it irks me so much how corrupt the system is.  Anyone have a similar experience?

__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 7139
Date:
Permalink Closed

This is one of the big reasons our healthcare system is in such trouble, and no it's not insurance fraud.  Most doctors have a relatively reasonable 'cash price' for direct pay by patients and then an exorbitant 'insurance billing price', because if they don't ask for it they surely won't get it.  Even when the insurance company agrees to reimburse them 50% of their exorbitant 'fee', they'd still (in this situation) get $350 and a tax write off for the 'unpaid' portion of their fee.  The sheer number of doctors that do this is really really sickening.

We have insurance, but have a out of pocket maximum that has to be met before they cover anything other than yearly checkups and prescriptions.  Many times, it's cheaper to negotiate with doctors for services as an individual than to pay the 20% that isn't 'covered'.  The way health insurance is set up these days, it's really only good for emergencies - we just end up paying for everything else out of pocket anyway ....

Be glad you didn't have to pay 20% off that doc's bogus $700 fee!

__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment ~ {Ralph Waldo Emerson}


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2065
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yeah, I agree with Elle. It ain't insurance fraud, but it sure as hell does suck.

Here's the deal with the insurance companies and their higher prices--

When you pay cash, you have to pay it right then and their and chances are that if it's super expensive, you won't pay or won't get the treatment. However, the insurance company will sure as shit pay for it (or somebody will...you might find your insurance company knocking on your door for the extra amount).

Plus, chances are that the cash amount doesn't actually the costs of providing the treatment. A doctor will bill an insurance company the cost of the treatment plus a profit plus an amount to cover what the cash people are paying. It's just a way of spreading costs around.

There's different fees for all sorts of different health services. Medicaid and Medicare have different billing amounts versus what the insurance company pays versus what an individual would pay. Plus, each insurance company will pay different amounts based on different contracts. In fact, Medicaid and Medicare both don't pay what the actual services are worth (which is why some doctors don't take these and also why some hospitals have such problems on their Labor and Delivery floors...but I'm getting off topic...). The insurance companies are expected to make up the difference in cost.

The thing about the ring is funny...it really is technically a "foreign body removal". If they were removing a wedding ring that a little kid swallowed (and couldn't pass for some reason), that's how it would get billed. Same service, same billing even if it's actually different services.

Wanna guess who's actually had (multiple) classes on budgeting for medical practices? smile.gif

__________________
"But I want you to remember, I intend this breast satirically." Susan from Coupling

http://qtipsandmammoths.blogspot.com/


Marc Jacobs

Status: Offline
Posts: 2130
Date:
Permalink Closed

"Is this insurance fraud?"

Hee. Try "capitalism."



__________________


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 3120
Date:
Permalink Closed

Elle wrote:

The way health insurance is set up these days, it's really only good for emergencies -


Heh. DH cut his finger on the 4th of July and had to go to the ER for ten stitches. We have Aetna, one of the more highly-rated insurance companies in consumer surveys, and they still expect us to pay $1200 of the $7K bill. So even in emergencies, the costs are absolutely insane.

 



__________________


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 3178
Date:
Permalink Closed

Suasoria wrote:
Heh. DH cut his finger on the 4th of July and had to go to the ER for ten stitches. We have Aetna, one of the more highly-rated insurance companies in consumer surveys, and they still expect us to pay $1200 of the $7K bill. So even in emergencies, the costs are absolutely insane.



$7,000 for 10 stitches?  That's ridiculous.  How long did it actually take to put them in?  The materials used couldn't even be that expensive.



__________________


Hermes

Status: Offline
Posts: 7139
Date:
Permalink Closed

Suasoria wrote:

Elle wrote:

The way health insurance is set up these days, it's really only good for emergencies -


Heh. DH cut his finger on the 4th of July and had to go to the ER for ten stitches. We have Aetna, one of the more highly-rated insurance companies in consumer surveys, and they still expect us to pay $1200 of the $7K bill. So even in emergencies, the costs are absolutely insane.



No, I mean big hospitalization-type emergencies, where the costs (ours at least) are capped at something like $6k/year out of pocket.  My DH cut his face while out of town and went to the ER for a shot of lidocaine and 5 stitches, costing us $350.  That kind of shit is seriously enough for me to consider not going to the ER unless I need to be admitted and really might die - a sewing kit is so much cheaper devilish.gif!  Or, superglue!

I know way too many people who have insurance that have gone bankrupt.  Isn't that like, the opposite of the point of insurance?



__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment ~ {Ralph Waldo Emerson}


Chanel

Status: Offline
Posts: 3120
Date:
Permalink Closed

I wonder if I still have the itemized bill around here - I must - but it was laughable. He had some sort of painkiller or anesthesia injection that was several hundred dollars. The doctor's time/labor was about half the bill.

AND and and, they wouldn't even give him a prescription for pain pills, as if he'd massively cut himself on purpose to scam them out of drugs or something.

But one of the things we experience here with all medical care is that our costs in L.A. are higher. The insurance company bases their allowed rates on some magic place in the midwest they consider average. If my lab tests cost $300 in L.A., and $120 in Nebraska, they only kick in for $120 (or their share of $120). Anything over that the insurer considers "excessive." Some providers here accept that while others don't, and as far as I can tell, what I eventually have to pay after insurance kicks in is sometimes a total crapshoot.

My FIL had heart surgery that was about $20,000 and he paid $90 out of pocket, but when he had another surgery that was about the same cost, he was responsible for more than half of it. Same insurance, same hospital. The only difference was the second one was considered an emergency so he could not get it preapproved. Also, although the lead surgeon was on his insurance plan, the assistant surgeon working that day was not, so that was a sizable portion of the bill. Unfortunately while he was being admitted to the hospital for an emergency triple bypass, my FIL did not have a chance to interview all the assistant surgeons in the hospital to find out if they accept his insurance.

__________________


Dooney & Bourke

Status: Offline
Posts: 735
Date:
Permalink Closed

when i was in the hospital having my second child, they charged my insurance $350 per meal! $350 for HOSPTIAL FOOD?!?!? i was supposed to stay for 2 days but i bailed early, figuring that extra day would send us into the poorhouse.

__________________
"apparently there are more important things in life than fashion... yeah, right."


Kate Spade

Status: Offline
Posts: 1486
Date:
Permalink Closed

I've been noticing this lately too on all my bills. Last month I had to have a D&C due to a miscarriage and they charged $10,200! Not including the aesthesiologist which isn't in my plan but the hospital was. I didn't have a choice as to the anesthesiologist so I don't feel I should have to pay. I was in the hospital for about three hours and the procedure lasted 4 minutes. It's insane. Last year I had my gall bladder removed and it was less than this!

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard