I know we've talked about these before, and I still really want them. I'm doing some shopping in the next two weeks thanks to my company's holiday bonus and this is one of the contenders:
Finally down to $250. What do we think? The other thing I'm looking at is this bag, also on sale:
I know I shouldn't wait long since both are on sale.
-- Edited by Vanessa at 19:27, 2004-12-22
__________________
http://v247.tumblr.com One cannot perceive beauty, but with a serene mind -Thoreau
quote: Originally posted by: Ritz "how much is the bag? if you were to get both, would you have any bonus money leftover?"
The bag is $626. I could definitely get both, but don't know if I should. Aesthetically though, which do you prefer? And which do you think is a better investment?
__________________
http://v247.tumblr.com One cannot perceive beauty, but with a serene mind -Thoreau
i think i might have accidentally voted for the bag but i think you should get the shoes. iirc, you already have an mj bag (or two) and while you can never have too much of a good thing, the extra savings could go towards another equally fabulous purchase. the resort & spring lines should be in stores very soon!
I voted both. The shoes are hot, and for MJ they are not so $$. And you can always ebay when you are sick of them.
The purse I happen to have and I absolutely adore it (mine might be slightly different... can't really see the topstiching on this one - but it's a black mj sophia). It is the one handbag purchase in my life - and you know I have many - that I have been absolutely satisfied with and love more as the leather grows softer and more "loved." If the cost-per-wear ratio is a factor, factor that bag in. I have already carried it about 3X per week since buying it last spring... compared with an estimated average for my other bags of less than 0 average to 2 times per week.
__________________
~ dc
"Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination" - Oscar Wilde
love the shoes, so my vote goes to them. do you already have a mj bag(s)? a similar kind with the same kind of buttons? if so, then I definitely think you should get the shoes
quote: Originally posted by: Vanessa "The bag is $626. I could definitely get both, but don't know if I should. Aesthetically though, which do you prefer? And which do you think is a better investment? "
aesthetically, i definitely prefer the shoes. they are definitely a statement piece. i think the purse may be a better investment but like someone said already, you can always ebay the shoes if you get tired of em! so on that note, i would go with both, or just the shoes.
I am voting for both, but I love the shoes more. They're a really interesting, unique color, and IMO you won't find anything similar for cheaper.
I think you should get both and see how often you use/wear them for the next month. If you don't adore them to death, you should be able to get close to what you paid on ebay.
__________________
"We live in an age where unnecessary things are our only necessities." --Oscar Wilde
Hey, if you're considering getting the shoes, I found one (the exact one) at Bloomingdales for alot cheaper... like, $215.99 cheap. It beats paying $250! They pretty much have sizes 6-10 medium left. Hope this helps!
Thanks exsupahero. Such is my luck though that any size I could possibly wear is sold out (6.5 or 7)! I wonder if these were on sale last week when bloomies had that 20% off code...
Thanks for thinking of me though! I think I've decided to take the plunge and get both - but now I'm deciding on a bag color. Check my other post to vote!
__________________
http://v247.tumblr.com One cannot perceive beauty, but with a serene mind -Thoreau