STYLETHREAD -- LET'S TALK SHOP!

tara t · Marc Jacobs

ew.

Hermes

omg - heinous!!!!

Farrah · Marc Jacobs

Those would actually be perfect if you wanted to wear a dress and want to show a little toe, but didn't have time to shave your legs. HAHAHAHA!!

kmd · Kate Spade

Why did Christian Louboutin let this happen?????

hotcocoa · Kate Spade

oh no!

...but i'm a little confused. how do those fringy tiers actually stay put on your legs?

Kelly · Hermes

Irregular Choice is always a good brand for fugly shoes :)

-- Edited by ttara123 at 12:49, 2008-11-05

sydney · Kate Spade

kmd wrote:
Why did Christian Louboutin let this happen?????

OMG - seriously - CL???? That is funny

Collette · Chanel

OK those shoes just made me grateful that I can't afford CL shoes after the divorce. Thanks I needed that!

relrel · Marc Jacobs

Wait, what's going on in that last picture that Ttara posted? Is the polka-dotted sock part of the shoe, and you put your foot into it? Or is it just decoration for the picture? If it is just decoration, it seems awfully strange that the fabric would be the same as on the shoe, right?

esquiress · Marc Jacobs

relrel wrote:

Wait, what's going on in that last picture that Ttara posted? Is the polka-dotted sock part of the shoe, and you put your foot into it? Or is it just decoration for the picture? If it is just decoration, it seems awfully strange that the fabric would be the same as on the shoe, right?

i totally wondered the same thing! I think it's part of the "sock" is part of the shoe--good grief, it sure did cover all of its ugly bases!

Kelly · Hermes

esquiress wrote:

relrel wrote:

Wait, what's going on in that last picture that Ttara posted? Is the polka-dotted sock part of the shoe, and you put your foot into it? Or is it just decoration for the picture? If it is just decoration, it seems awfully strange that the fabric would be the same as on the shoe, right?

i totally wondered the same thing! I think it's part of the "sock" is part of the shoe--good grief, it sure did cover all of its ugly bases!

Oh, it is definitely attached and part of the shoe. I checked that out because I wondered the same thing :)

AllieGurl · Marc Jacobs

If CL's were around in 1592, phocohontus would so have been sporting those around the forest!

NCshopper · Hermes

ttara123 wrote:

esquiress wrote:

relrel wrote:

Wait, what's going on in that last picture that Ttara posted? Is the polka-dotted sock part of the shoe, and you put your foot into it? Or is it just decoration for the picture? If it is just decoration, it seems awfully strange that the fabric would be the same as on the shoe, right?

i totally wondered the same thing! I think it's part of the "sock" is part of the shoe--good grief, it sure did cover all of its ugly bases!

Oh, it is definitely attached and part of the shoe. I checked that out because I wondered the same thing :)

I think my favorite part is the flip-flop thong thingy between the toes. With the sock. Because, you know, I've always love to wear high heeled flip flops with socks and now it's all rolled into one shoe! Sweet!